Connecting the Dots Past Articles |
- October 01, 2008
- September 24, 2008
- September 10, 2008
- August 18, 2008
- August 08, 2008
- July 14, 2008
- June 10, 2008
- May 13, 2008
- April 22, 2008
- January 29, 2008
- September 25, 2007
- August 14, 2007
|
Connecting the Dots
June 10,2008 by Andy Montgomery
The Fathers of a Crisis
In 1969, the 31 year old son of a Bronx
butcher formed a partnership with another
mortgage banker, David Loeb, to launch
Countrywide Credit Industries. The
company that Angelo Mozilo created was
not initially successful, at least for its
shareholders. In fact, the stock languished
under $1 a share for a number of years
and was de-listed until 1985.
The initial purpose of the company was
to take a successful mortgage banking
operation and make it a national brand.
By advertising rates and fees, utilizing
technology and making the home
mortgage more accessible to the consumer,
Countrywide grew to be the nation’s
largest and most successful home
mortgage lender.
The company thrived in the refinance
boom in the last decade and the stock
returned a whopping 23,000% between
1982 and 2003. Moreover, Countrywide
helped launch a proliferation of mortgage
brokers by giving them access to liquidity
through various secondary market
investment vehicles.
In the mid 1970’s, James Montgomery’s
mission was to pioneer the variable rate
mortgage. He had been unsuccessful
when he tried it earlier as Chief Financial
Officer with United Savings. But in 1975,
as President of a much larger institution,Great Western Savings, Montgomery
believed he then had the clout and capacity
to make it work.
The reasons to do it were simple. Savings
and Loans were getting killed by long-term
fixed rate mortgages when interest rates rose
on their sources of funding, deposits. By
allowing the mortgage rate to vary with the
bank’s cost of funds, Montgomery knew he
could create a much stronger balance sheet
for his institution. He also believed it
would benefit the consumer as the lower
introductory rates would allow for easier
entry into homeownership.
In the late 1970’s, Lewis Ranieri, already
at 31 known as a bond king, introduced a
revolutionary new financial instrument
called the mortgage backed security. This
security allowed financial institutions to
transfer the interest rate risk associated with
mortgages to investors in these securities.
These securities would act similar to other
bonds and would be rated based on their risk
by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. In
turn, by shifting these mortgages off of the
balance sheet and into the securities, the
savings institutions would free up additional
liquidity to make more loans.
With these and other innovations, the
mortgage industry was off and running.
Throughout the 80’s and 90’s, easy access
to mortgages, variable or adjustable rate
products, and plenty of liquidity supplied
by the securitization market, made homeownership
a reality for countless more
Americans. It also fueled what seemed to be
never-ending home appreciation and a
healthy building industry.
All three innovations were good ideas at
the time. In fact, all three innovations remain
good ideas when administered correctly.
However, time and greed often have a
way of mutating fundamentally sound
ideas. By the late 1990’s, those ideas were
beginning to go terribly wrong.
Angelo Mozilo probably never envisioned
that the mortgage brokerage offices that
sold loans to and through his company
would be more ubiquitous than 7-11’s. He
also never imagined that many of the
mortgage originators would have no more
training than the clerks of those convenience
stores or no more accountability than an
aluminum siding salesman. But, as the
market intensified and as Countrywide
grew, Mr. Mozilo lost track. Even as he
began to warn of an impending crisis in
2005, Mozilo also bragged that
Countrywide was not in the business of
making risky, sub-prime loans. Sadly, he
was mistaken and he and his company have
paid the price.
James Montgomery certainly never
envisioned or condoned the use of variable
or adjustable interest rate products in the
manner in which they were used over the
past few years. Pay option, interest only,
hybrids with low teaser rates, were not part
of the lexicon when Great Western was sold
to Washington Mutual in 1997. Even during
his tenure on the board of Freddie Mac until
2002, Mr. Montgomery would have
protested if he knew the lender was to
qualify the borrower’s ability to repay based
on a teaser rate or on non-documented (now
commonly referred to as LIAR) income.
As interest rates declined in 2001 and
beyond, banks were faced with a fiercely
competitive market. It is in the face of this
competition that mortgage originators began
to throw underwriting criteria out the
window. The traditional down payment
required to buy a home was replaced by
105% financing. Borrowers too often were
qualified by mortgage brokers who filled
out application documents for the borrower
based, not on reality, but what the investor
wanted to see. All of sudden, it seemed
almost overnight, the difference between
A-paper, Alt-A paper and Sub-Prime paper
was blurred. Everyone felt the bond rating
agencies would know the difference. It turns
out they did not.
Clearly, Mr. Ranieri knew something was
wrong. He began warning of the impending
disaster in the mortgage and housing
markets a few years ago, but no one was
listening by that point. Even the bank he
founded and of which he still remains
Chairman wasn’t listening. His message was
clear and easy to follow; you throw out this
much liquidity into the market and you
throw out underwriting standards, you create
an unsustainable bubble that is going to pop.
The fathers were talking. The sons weren’t
listening. The drum beats of profit and greed
were too loud. The fear of the consequences
could be pushed off another day. The wax
in Icarus’s wings was destined to melt.
The bubble simply popped. And, the
consequences of a bubble popping, as
opposed to the air being gradually let out, is
that it can’t be easily re-inflated.
The mortgage and housing market now
needs to be rebuilt. As part of that
rebuilding, we will need to restructure the
mortgage banking industry, adjustable
rate mortgage products and the
underwriting of mortgage backed
securities. All three elements will be an
integral part of the rebuilding process.
Ironically, the future mortgage industry
will probably operate very much like
Messrs. Mozilo, Montgomery and
Ranieri envisioned in the first place.
|